Repository license

[kotleni]

When creating this repository, I chose the GPL 2.0 license (because I use it primarily in my projects and I prefer it).
Is this license ok for you/us? @y9san9

[y9san9]

GPL will not allow to use this project if you build something that is not open-source. I think it's alright, but my personal preference is MIT and I allow to use my code even if people want to make money out of it. I think generally it's always a win-win situation and code doesn't cost anything. It's the ideas and direction we have in our heads that matters. But I am alright with your choice.

[y9san9]

@kotleni I remembered that in order to change license from gpl to mit later we will need a written agreement from each of the contributors. Maybe we will make it MIT now, so we don't have to bother with this in the future?

[kotleni]

@y9san9 If you want to make it MIT, lets do it now then.

[y9san9]

Yeah, sure, I'll do that. I am not sure if that's the best fit, but MIT -> GPL migration is free essentially, while GPL -> MIT is harder when there are many contributors

[kotleni]

@y9san9 For now we need to agree new LICENSE only with 1 contributor, so