From 899d10dcfcacf81bb1d9a400091a9883e6d35a23 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "google-labs-jules[bot]"
 <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 20:38:56 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] test: add test for pending count dropping below zero

- Added new test file `src/__tests__/Squawk.pending.test.ts`
- Verifies that calling store.pending("prop", false) throws an Error when count is already 0
- Included happy path test to verify normal pending true/false usage
- Improves testing coverage for Squawk error conditions

Co-authored-by: johnstrand <11484777+johnstrand@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 src/__tests__/Squawk.pending.test.ts | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 src/__tests__/Squawk.pending.test.ts

diff --git a/src/__tests__/Squawk.pending.test.ts b/src/__tests__/Squawk.pending.test.ts
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8f4f570
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/__tests__/Squawk.pending.test.ts
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+import createStore from "../Squawk";
+
+describe("Squawk pending", () => {
+  it("throws error when pending count drops below zero", () => {
+    const store = createStore({
+      testProp: "initial"
+    });
+
+    // Calling pending with false when count is 0 should throw
+    expect(() => {
+      store.pending("testProp", false);
+    }).toThrowError('Too many calls to pending("testProp", false)');
+  });
+
+  it("handles happy path of pending correctly", () => {
+    const store = createStore({
+      testProp: "initial"
+    });
+
+    // Initially setting to true should not throw
+    expect(() => {
+      store.pending("testProp", true);
+    }).not.toThrow();
+
+    // Setting back to false should also not throw (count returns to 0)
+    expect(() => {
+      store.pending("testProp", false);
+    }).not.toThrow();
+  });
+});