docs(inventory): remove TBD placeholder comments leaking into generated docs and swagger

[RedZapdos123]

Description:

Latest main still contains placeholder public comments in inventory/inventory.proto, and those placeholders are propagated into generated documentation and OpenAPI output.

Current behavior:

On latest main, inventory/inventory.proto still has unresolved placeholder comments:

• inventory/inventory.proto:167
  • // TBD
• inventory/inventory.proto:172
  • // TBD: Type 9 or Type 41 ?

Because these comments are public proto comments, they leak into generated artifacts that are checked into the repository:

• inventory/v1/autogen.md:160
  • total_usable_bytes description is TBD
• inventory/v1/autogen.md:171
  • PCIeDeviceInfo section still says TBD: Type 9 or Type 41 ?
• inventory/v1/gen/go/inventory.swagger.json:216
  • total_usable_bytes has "title": "TBD"
• inventory/v1/gen/go/inventory.swagger.json:257
  • PCIeDeviceInfo description still contains TBD: Type 9 or Type 41 ?
• Generated Go comments also inherit same placeholders:
  • inventory/v1/gen/go/inventory.pb.go:516
  • inventory/v1/gen/go/inventory.pb.go:568
  • v1/gen/go/inventory/inventory.pb.go:498
  • v1/gen/go/inventory/inventory.pb.go:550

Expected behavior:

Public inventory API comments should use final descriptive wording, not unresolved placeholders, and regenerated docs/swagger should no longer expose TBD.

Why this matters:

• Public API docs look unfinished.
• Generated Swagger/OpenAPI metadata exposes ambiguous placeholder text.
• Low risk cleanup: this is documentation/comment quality work, not a wire-format change.

Issue Reproduction:

1. Check out latest main.
2. Run:

rg -n "TBD" \
  inventory/inventory.proto \
  inventory/v1/autogen.md \
  inventory/v1/gen/go/inventory.swagger.json \
  inventory/v1/gen/go/inventory.pb.go \
  v1/gen/go/inventory/inventory.pb.go

3. Observe matches for the placeholder comments and their generated outputs.

[RedZapdos123]

Opened a PR to resolve the issue.

[iqraurooj111]

Hi! I would like to work on this issue. Could you please assign it to me?