Is assignedBy needed for the following identifier types?
Vehicle
- IMONumber
- LicencePlateNumber
- RadioCallSign
- TrainNumber
- VesselName
- VoyageNumber
Units
- ContainerID
- CassetteID
- ISO6346ContainerNumber
# Don't use `assignedBy` with ISO6346ContainerNumber!
- LicencePlateNumber
- RailCarID
- RFTagSerialNumber
- SealNumber
- TrailerID
- VesselUnitID
Currently optional assignedBy,
- LogisticsSupplier
- Supplier
In XML papiNet has agency instead of assignedBy. An agency can specify what standard is used for the identifier, e.g. for a RailCarID.
The standard used could also be included in the name of the identifier type, e.g. ISO6346ContainerNumber.
Is type TrailerID needed?
Or will always LicencePlateNumber be used for trailers?
Is assignedBy needed for the following identifier types?
Vehicle
Units
Currently optional assignedBy,
- LogisticsSupplier
- Supplier
In XML papiNet has agency instead of assignedBy. An agency can specify what standard is used for the identifier, e.g. for a RailCarID.
The standard used could also be included in the name of the identifier type, e.g. ISO6346ContainerNumber.
Is type
TrailerIDneeded?Or will always LicencePlateNumber be used for trailers?