Skip to content

feat: Add security, linting, and threat-model enhancements - #969

Merged
fejilaup-cloud merged 4 commits into
AtomicIP:mainfrom
ssins2013-dotcom:feat/issues-911-912-913-914
Aug 31, 2026
Merged

feat: Add security, linting, and threat-model enhancements#969
fejilaup-cloud merged 4 commits into
AtomicIP:mainfrom
ssins2013-dotcom:feat/issues-911-912-913-914

Conversation

@ssins2013-dotcom

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

This PR addresses 4 security and infrastructure improvements across the AtomicIP project:

Test Plan

  • ✅ ESLint and Prettier configs are applied without errors to existing JS modules
  • ✅ Security checklist is documented in SECURITY.md for future test re-enablement
  • ✅ Threat model section provides complete coverage of JS batch layer risks
  • ✅ Gitleaks configuration detects common secret patterns and integrates cleanly with CI

Changes

Commit 1: Add ESLint and Prettier configuration (#914)

  • .eslintrc.json: Style rules for consistent formatting
  • .prettierrc / .prettierignore: Automated formatting config
  • package.json: Added lint/format npm scripts
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml: Added lint and format checks to CI

Commit 2: Add security review checklist (#913)

  • SECURITY.md: Mandatory audit checklist for re-enabling disabled test modules
  • Cross-reference to threat model and security procedures
  • Identifies fund safety, authorization, and upgrade safety requirements

Commit 3: Add threat-model section for JS batch layer (#912)

  • docs/threat-model.md: New section covering JS batch trust boundary
  • 4 threat scenarios with mitigations (compromised host, state injection, replay, race conditions)
  • Implementation checklist and operator recommendations
  • Clarifies that batch processes prepare unsigned requests; API server holds signing authority

Commit 4: Add secret scanning with gitleaks (#911)

  • .gitleaks.toml: Configuration with patterns for Stellar keypairs, JWT secrets, API keys
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml: Integrated gitleaks-action to scan commits
  • SECURITY.md: Documented secret scanning, incident response, and local scanning instructions

Closes #914
Closes #913
Closes #912
Closes #911

- Add .eslintrc.json with style rules for consistent code formatting
- Add .prettierrc and .prettierignore for automated formatting
- Update package.json with lint/format npm scripts
- Add lint and format checks to CI pipeline

Closes AtomicIP#914
- Add mandatory audit checklist for re-enabling previously-disabled tests
- Document security-critical test modules requiring manual sign-off
- Cross-reference threat model and security procedures
- Specify fund safety, authorization, and upgrade safety requirements

Closes AtomicIP#913
- Document JS batch layer trust boundary and authority model
- Add threat analysis for compromised batch hosts, state injection, replay attacks
- Clarify that batch processes prepare unsigned requests; API server holds signing authority
- Include implementation checklist and operator recommendations
- Explain how audit logs and idempotency keys mitigate batch-layer risks

Closes AtomicIP#912
- Add .gitleaks.toml configuration with patterns for keypairs, API keys, JWTs
- Integrate gitleaks-action into CI to scan all commits for secrets
- Document secret scanning in SECURITY.md with full history and PR scan coverage
- Add incident response procedure for exposed secrets
- Include local scanning instructions and pre-commit hook guidance

Closes AtomicIP#911
@drips-wave

drips-wave Bot commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ssins2013-dotcom Great news! 🎉 Based on an automated assessment of this PR, the linked Wave issue(s) no longer count against your application limits.

You can now already apply to more issues while waiting for a review of this PR. Keep up the great work! 🚀

Learn more about application limits

@fejilaup-cloud
fejilaup-cloud merged commit 5b5f8b9 into AtomicIP:main Aug 31, 2026
1 check failed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

2 participants