Create ANLcr88.xml - #3519
Create ANLcr88.xml#3519
Conversation
I updated the Taammera Libanos records in BetaMasaheft/Works#2082 and LIT1494Gadlas in BetaMasaheft/Works#2081. I created new PRS records in BetaMasaheft/Persons#1448.
| <locus from="2ra" to="55vb"/> | ||
| <title ref="LIT6386Libanos"/> | ||
| <note>The manuscript was not used in <bibl><ptr target="bm:ContiRossini1903Ricordi"/></bibl>; yet, judging by the | ||
| sequence and numbering of the attested miracles, it was copied from an original very closely related to the one from which |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For me this is a tautology: it was copied from an original very closely related to the one from which
these fragments derive.
So this manuscript was copied from an exemplar that is close in contents to this manuscript.
Sorry, I am lost. I am sure you wanted to say sth. meaningful.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The manuscript is close to the one, which was edited by Conti Rossini.
| </msItem> | ||
| <msItem xml:id="ms_i1.2.4"> | ||
| <locus from="23vb" to="24rb"/> | ||
| <title ref="LIT7637MirLib3">Miracle 3: Story of the man who stole from a dignitary</title> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
a man
I think you need to say "stole" and then the thing (stole sth.); otherwise you need "robbed a dignitary"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The title is taken from Dorotheas record. saraqa can mean both: to 'steal' (to take secretly) and to 'rob' (to take forcefully).
If I change here, I should make this change also to LIT7637MirLib3 and to ESmgm012.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Chat GPT says that it is actually ok to say "stole from a dignitary". I am sorry for the confusion
| <msItem xml:id="ms_i1.3"> | ||
| <locus from="52vb" to="55vb"/> | ||
| <title type="incomplete" ref="LIT3097RepCh377"/> | ||
| <note>The first stanza seems to be missing.</note> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Either it is missing or it is there
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The texts starts with the second stanza. I do not know for sure, whether the first stanza is missing or misplaced.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
what you have now is a good way out
| ዕለተ፡ ቆመት፡ በዴዴ፡ ቤተ፡ ክርስቲያን፡ እንዘ፡ ትጸንሖ፡ ለአቡነ፡ ሠምረ፡ ክርስቶስ፡ ወአቡነሰ፡ ቅዱስ፡ ሀለወ፡ በተክህኖ፡ እንዘ፡ ይቄድስ፡ ቍርባነ፡</incipit> | ||
| </msItem> | ||
| <msItem xml:id="ms_i2.2.4"> | ||
| <locus from="63rb"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
should it not be simply <locus target="#63rb"/> ?
| አቡነ፡ ሠምረ፡ ክርስቶስ፡</incipit> | ||
| </msItem> | ||
| <msItem xml:id="ms_i2.2.16"> | ||
| <locus from="67rb"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
should it not be with a target?
| <additions> | ||
| <list> | ||
| <item xml:id="e1"> | ||
| <desc type="findingAid">The text is divided into the days for the commemoration of the saint for each month: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I do not understand: the text is divided into monthly readings, why "into the days"? The day is fixed, no? It is the feast of the saint.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes.
The text is divided into the readings for the commemoration of the saint for each month:
| The finding aids for the months Sane and Nahāse are missing.</desc> | ||
| </item> | ||
| <item xml:id="e2"> | ||
| <desc>A label on the front cover with the following text written in red ink:</desc> |
| these fragments derive. The manuscript was used in <bibl><ptr target="bm:Bausi2003Libanos"/></bibl> with the siglum | ||
| ‘B’.</note> | ||
| <note>The manuscript was not used in <bibl><ptr target="bm:ContiRossini1903Ricordi"/></bibl>; yet, given the | ||
| sequence and numbering of the attested miracles, however, it was copied from an original very closely related to the one |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we use the word "exemplar" for the ms from which a text was copied.
| <msItem xml:id="ms_i1.2.4"> | ||
| <locus from="23vb" to="24rb"/> | ||
| <title ref="LIT7637MirLib3">Miracle 3: Story of the man who stole from a dignitary</title> | ||
| <title ref="LIT7637MirLib3">Miracle 3: Story of a man who had robbed a dignitary</title> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
robbed (no "had", you do not need here a pluperfect)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
please go back to the previous version "stole from..."
| The finding aids for the months Sane and Nahāse are missing.</desc> | ||
| </item> | ||
| <item xml:id="e2"> | ||
| <desc>A label on the front cover with the following text written in red ink:</desc> |
According to Magdas suggestions in BetaMasaheft/Manuscripts#3519.


I updated the Taammera Libanos records in BetaMasaheft/Works#2082 and LIT1494Gadlas in BetaMasaheft/Works#2081.
I created new PRS records in BetaMasaheft/Persons#1448.