Skip to content

docs: restore the 0.5.0 entry the gate used to forbid - #32

Merged
Bubblegunn merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/restore-0-5-0-entry
Sep 19, 2026
Merged

Bubblegunn merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/restore-0-5-0-entry

Conversation

@Bubblegunn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The entry from #26 that had to be reverted in #27, restored now that #29 lets the CHANGELOG carry a pending release.

The gate on this branch:

release-gate: ok, 0.5.0 pending, package at 0.4.2, 47 packed files all allowed

That is the exact state that turned main red this morning, and it is now the documented, tested "pending" state.

It credits both of @shivam-070208's contributions on the day they landed instead of at release time. That was the point of #28: the contradiction was not a tidiness problem, it was the reason an outside contributor could not be named in the changelog when their work merged.

The version stays 0.4.2 and the entry stays undated. scripts/release.mjs dates it and bumps the version at release.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

This entry was written when #26 merged, turned main red, and had to be reverted in
#27 because release-gate.mjs required the top CHANGELOG heading to equal
package.json's version on every push. #29 fixed that. The gate now reports:

  release-gate: ok, 0.5.0 pending, package at 0.4.2, 47 packed files all allowed

which is the exact state it rejected this morning.

The entry credits both of shivam-070208's contributions on the day they landed
rather than at release time, which is what the contradiction had been preventing
for every outside contributor, not only this one.

Text recovered from issue #28, where it was parked so the revert would not lose it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Bubblegunn
Bubblegunn merged commit cefe3da into main Sep 19, 2026
18 checks passed
@Bubblegunn
Bubblegunn deleted the docs/restore-0-5-0-entry branch September 19, 2026 15:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant