docs: add SEO article draft on tool manifest detection - #123
sarthakagrawal927 merged 1 commit into
Conversation
Creates an evidence-backed SEO article draft titled "Detecting tools from manifests without overstating certainty" in the marketing directory. The draft adheres to length requirements, provides source notes rooted in the codebase, and refrains from inventing metrics or modifying product code. Co-authored-by: sarthakagrawal927 <43884471+sarthakagrawal927@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
1 participant
Creates an SEO article draft titled "Detecting tools from manifests without overstating certainty" in the marketing directory.
This article draft incorporates evidence from the repository files (
repo-tools.ts,refresh-manifest.md,tool-intelligence-guide.tsx, etc.), discusses confidence scores based on manifests/SBOMs vs README/topic signals, includes a structural outline, meets the 1200-1800 useful word constraint, internal link suggestions, and an internal unpublishable Source Notes section as instructed. No actual project code, locks, or configurations have been changed, making it a pure content addition for review.PR created automatically by Jules for task 16716440578605645024 started by @sarthakagrawal927