Skip to content
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
43 changes: 43 additions & 0 deletions .planning/phases/01-enterprise-governance/01-REVIEW.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
---
phase: 01-enterprise-governance
reviewed: 2026-07-11T13:55:00Z
depth: deep
files_reviewed: 5
files_reviewed_list:
- .github/workflows/release-please-reusable.yml
- .github/workflows/release-please.yml
- docs/RELEASE_POLICY.md
- release-please-config.json
- .release-please-manifest.json
findings:
critical: 0
warning: 0
info: 0
total: 0
status: clean
---

# Phase 01: Code Review Report

**Reviewed:** 2026-07-11T13:55:00Z
**Depth:** deep
**Files Reviewed:** 5
**Status:** clean

## Narrative Findings (AI reviewer)

PASS.

Verified against the submitted PR head (`b3cb8c121388f6af367aa64fa507282096522f83`) and current public GitHub documentation:

- Same-repo reusable workflow syntax is valid. `.github/workflows/release-please.yml` now uses `./.github/workflows/release-please-reusable.yml`, which GitHub documents as the supported syntax for calling a reusable workflow from the same repository and same commit.
- Manifest-mode release-please behavior is consistent with the action’s documented v4+ behavior. Removing the `workflow_call` `release-type` input and not passing `release-type` to `googleapis/release-please-action` is correct for manifest mode; strategy is derived from `release-please-config.json`.
- Docs/runtime consistency holds for the changed scope. `docs/RELEASE_POLICY.md` now accurately describes the local-call exception for this repository, the manifest-driven `simple` strategy in `release-please-config.json`, and the `0.0.0` bootstrap baseline in `.release-please-manifest.json`. Public repo state also matches the zero-tag claim for `Coding-Autopilot-System/.github`.
- No workflow security regression was found in this PR. The third-party action remains SHA-pinned, and switching this repository’s self-call from an owner/repo ref to a same-repo relative path keeps caller and callee on the same reviewed commit rather than loosening provenance.
- Downstream compatibility check passed. Current public callers in the `Coding-Autopilot-System` org pin the reusable workflow by SHA and do not pass the removed `release-type` input, so this interface cleanup does not break their workflow syntax when they later repin.

---

_Reviewed: 2026-07-11T13:55:00Z_
_Reviewer: the agent (gsd-code-reviewer)_
_Depth: deep_
Binary file added profile/assets/governed-autonomy.png
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.