feat: harden LiteLLM guardrail and add batch redaction#168
Open
sidmohan0 wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
action/entity_types/fail_policyoptions and exact/regex allowlists while addingdatafog_*aliases and locale configurationdatafog.redact_many(),BatchRedactResult, and computedentity_countson scan/redaction resultsWhy
The existing compatibility adapter only inspected basic
messages[].contentrequests andchoices[].message.contentresponses. Prompt-bearing fields such as Responses APIinput, completion prompts, tool arguments and definitions, structured-output schemas, and streaming deltas could bypass PII enforcement.This also folds reusable integration work into DataFog itself: integrations can consume entity totals directly and redact multiple fragments with stable token numbering and pseudonym assignments without concatenating text or changing detection boundaries.
Compatibility
The compatibility class continues to accept DataFog's original option names and remains enabled by default when instantiated directly. Explicit
default_on: falseconfigurations still require request selection through LiteLLM. Existing allowlist behavior is retained.Validation
96 passedin focused engine, bridge API, no-network, and LiteLLM guardrail suitesen_core_web_lgspaCy model, which is not installed locally