Skip to content

ci(fuzz): long repro run for build 16 failure (draft, will close) - #891

Closed
nicolasburtey wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/fuzz-repro-b16
Closed

nicolasburtey wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/fuzz-repro-b16

Conversation

@nicolasburtey

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Temporary PR to trigger a 25min/target GHA fuzz run reproducing https://ci.galoy.io/teams/dev/pipelines/cala/jobs/fuzz/builds/16 (repo fd40a8f). Will be closed once the failing target is identified.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Performance Report

Commit: 37fbd75
Updated: 2026-09-21 22:14:41 UTC

Cala Performance Benchmark Results (non-representative)

Criterion Benchmark Results (single-threaded)

Benchmark Time per Run Throughput % vs Baseline
post_simple_transaction 2.804ms 356 tx/s 0 (baseline)
post_multi_layer_transaction 2.819ms 354 tx/s -0.0%
post_simple_transaction_with_effective_balances 3.972ms 251 tx/s -41.0%
post_simple_transaction_with_skipped_velocity 2.561ms 390 tx/s +8.0%
post_simple_transaction_with_velocity 3.069ms 325 tx/s -9.0%
post_simple_transaction_with_hit_velocity 1.625ms 615 tx/s +42.0%
post_simple_transaction_with_one_account_set 2.662ms 375 tx/s +5.0%
post_simple_transaction_with_five_account_sets 3.256ms 307 tx/s -16.0%
post_simple_transaction_with_ec_account_set 2.927ms 341 tx/s -4.0%

Load Testing Results (parallel-execution)

Scenario tx/s
1 parallel 234.01
2 parallel 373.74
5 parallel 516.78
10 parallel 485.56
20 parallel 502.33
2 contention 268.66
5 contention 264.83
2 acct_sets 204.63
5 acct_sets 211.02

Note: Performance results may vary based on system resources and database state.

Last updated by commit 37fbd75

@nicolasburtey

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Closing: the 25m/target GHA repro passed clean (timeout needs CI's more-evolved corpus), and the build-16 log identified the failure directly. Superseded by the fix PR.

@nicolasburtey
nicolasburtey deleted the ci/fuzz-repro-b16 branch September 23, 2026 17:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant