refactor(pagination)!: bump es-entity to 0.14.1, job to 0.16.1, obix to 0.13.1

[nicolasburtey]

Migrates cala to the released chain versions. Migration code adapted from #889 (whose Check Code failure was a Magic Nix Cache rate-limit flake; its Integration Test passed).

• es-entity 0.13.0 -> 0.14.1 (breaking pagination API: Page enum, has_next_page()/end_cursor() accessors, into_end_cursor())
• job 0.15.2 -> 0.16.1
• obix 0.12.3 -> 0.13.1

Part of the release-crate-chain roll: es-entity -> job -> obix -> cala -> lana-bank.

---

Note

Medium Risk
Breaking pagination API changes affect every es-entity list path; behavior should be unchanged if tests pass, but cursor continuation and “has next page” semantics are easy to get wrong during migration.

Overview
Bumps the workspace dependency chain to es-entity 0.14.1, job 0.16.1, and obix 0.13.1 (with matching Cargo.lock / fuzz/Cargo.lock updates, including transitive sqlparser 0.63.0).

Adapts cala to es-entity’s breaking pagination API: paginated results no longer use into_parts() or has_next_page / end_cursor fields. Call sites now use into_page() with the Page::Last / Page::HasNext enum, has_next_page(), end_cursor(), and into_end_cursor() for cursor continuation.

Production: Entries::list_for_transaction_id unpacks the repo page via into_page() before sorting by sequence.

Tests: shared helpers::expect_single_page for single-page assertions; pagination tests (account set members, effective-balance list_modified_since, filtered entries) updated to the new accessors and multi-page loops via Page::HasNext.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 8e58777. Configure here.}

[github-actions]

📊 Performance Report

Commit: 8e58777
Updated: 2026-09-23 02:37:14 UTC

Cala Performance Benchmark Results (non-representative)

Criterion Benchmark Results (single-threaded)

Benchmark	Time per Run	Throughput	% vs Baseline
post_simple_transaction	2.052ms	487 tx/s	0 (baseline)
post_multi_layer_transaction	2.124ms	470 tx/s	-3.0%
post_simple_transaction_with_effective_balances	3.955ms	252 tx/s	-92.0%
post_simple_transaction_with_skipped_velocity	3.097ms	322 tx/s	-50.0%
post_simple_transaction_with_velocity	2.672ms	374 tx/s	-30.0%
post_simple_transaction_with_hit_velocity	1.015ms	984 tx/s	+50.0%
post_simple_transaction_with_one_account_set	2.019ms	495 tx/s	+1.0%
post_simple_transaction_with_five_account_sets	2.613ms	382 tx/s	-27.0%
post_simple_transaction_with_ec_account_set	3.551ms	281 tx/s	-72.0%

Load Testing Results (parallel-execution)

Scenario	tx/s
1 parallel	301.64
2 parallel	469.33
5 parallel	550.64
10 parallel	581.80
20 parallel	606.85
2 contention	337.27
5 contention	269.63
2 acct_sets	232.40
5 acct_sets	274.30

---

Note: Performance results may vary based on system resources and database state.

Last updated by commit 8e58777