Skip to content

NRCL-101 Prepare venue access questions and cost trial - #34

Merged
hudsonaikins merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
codex/nrcl-101-venue-access-plan
Sep 10, 2026
Merged

NRCL-101 Prepare venue access questions and cost trial#34
hudsonaikins merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
codex/nrcl-101-venue-access-plan

Conversation

@hudsonaikins

@hudsonaikins hudsonaikins commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Prepare access decisions before a retained-data sports trial: existing-account delegation, hosted strategies, retention/replay/display rights and effective venue fees. Add unsent Kalshi, Novig and Polymarket US questions and a finite three-game, nine-snapshot protocol at 10/100/1,000-contract sizes.

The protocol defers if qualified venue results disagree or any size lacks the predeclared coverage. Exact source references distinguish the Novig PDF digest from its discovery directory. The report is linked from the existing product overview.

Validation: documentation validator and Fumadocs build passed at bfaa6ae; hosted checks run on the pushed candidate. Earlier unchanged SDK checks passed 317 tests with 6 skipped.

Plane: https://app.plane.so/intelligent-intellectual-property/projects/7ffb1939-48c5-4a7a-a4be-6cd283fc8274/issues/9b7fc695-f593-4c09-9cec-eccb09723fde

Preparation only: permissions remain unconfirmed and no comparative execution-cost study or live-venue selection is claimed. No vendor messages, credentials, paid calls, orders or deployment. NRCL-101 remains incomplete pending permissions and qualified study inputs. Merge awaits explicit approval.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

📚 Documentation Status

✅ Documentation changes detected

  • Documentation structure validated
  • Links checked for broken references

This comment is automatically generated by the documentation workflow.

@makeplane

makeplane Bot commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Linked to Plane Work Item(s)

References

This comment was auto-generated by Plane

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

Review the NRCL-101 preparation at eb999e4. Check that vendor questions, source conflicts and unperformed cost-study boundaries are accurately represented.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: eb999e4bc4

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread docs/research/2026-09-10-venue-access-and-cost-plan.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/research/2026-09-10-venue-access-and-cost-plan.mdx
Comment thread docs/research/2026-09-10-venue-access-and-cost-plan.md Outdated

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

Review updated head 3cbdeba. The report now uses the repository's MDX format and is linked from the existing navigable product overview. Content and rendered build validation passed. Access and the actual cost study remain incomplete.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Bravo.

Reviewed commit: 3cbdeba98e

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

Review bfaa6ae. Addressed all three findings: exact Novig PDF identity, Kalshi access/fee inquiry, and predeclared venue decision with defer-on-disagreement. Docs validation and rendered build passed.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Another round soon, please!

Reviewed commit: bfaa6ae004

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

@hudsonaikins
hudsonaikins merged commit f867beb into main Sep 10, 2026
9 checks passed
@hudsonaikins
hudsonaikins deleted the codex/nrcl-101-venue-access-plan branch September 10, 2026 20:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant