test: expand security audit edge-case coverage - #12
Open
man4ish wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds 20 deterministic, security-focused edge-case tests for the audit service without modifying production source files.
Baseline
Final hermetic result
The deterministic suite excludes the hanging route/integration modules and backend integration tests requiring unavailable infrastructure. This PR does not claim that the entire repository suite passed.
Coverage
No coverage exclusions or pragmas were added, and tests were not weakened.
Covered security behavior
Production source protection
Production source files modified: 0.
Only
tests/test_security_edge_cases.pyis included. No generated artifacts, coverage reports, caches, or unrelated changes are included.Known limitations
Discovered production issue
worker/main.pyaccessesfields["data"]before its exception handler. A malformed Redis message missingdatacan raiseKeyErroroutside the documented failure-handling path.This issue is documented only and intentionally NOT fixed in this PR. It should be handled separately as a production bug-fix PR.
Final verdict
PASS WITH CONDITIONS: meaningful security-focused coverage exceeds the statement/line and branch targets, while the full repository suite remains limited by existing hangs and unavailable infrastructure.