Skip to content

fix(container): update image revenz/fileflows (6d7ffdd ➔ 1f412e4) - #5184

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/revenz-fileflows-26.09
Open

renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/revenz-fileflows-26.09

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Sep 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change
revenz/fileflows digest 6d7ffdd1f412e4

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone Europe/Brussels)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited based on label configuration.

🚫 Review skipped — only excluded labels are configured. (2)
  • type/patch
  • type/digest

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: Tanguille/cluster/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: e15164e5-993a-4fe8-b045-9d456472aa19

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@tanguille-cluster

Copy link
Copy Markdown
@@ spec.template.spec.containers.app.image @@
# apps/v1/Deployment/media/fileflows
! ± value change
- revenz/fileflows:26.09@sha256:6d7ffdd05b67780ba8f9b5f3b96e41228634f3882448f937772973ffcaf79df5
+ revenz/fileflows:26.09@sha256:1f412e4e2b411a18d25538095629ef870185ea602f9840caab06088dec8231ae

@tanguille-cluster

Copy link
Copy Markdown
@@ spec.values.controllers.fileflows.containers.app.image.tag @@
# helm.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v2/HelmRelease/media/fileflows
! ± value change
- 26.09@sha256:6d7ffdd05b67780ba8f9b5f3b96e41228634f3882448f937772973ffcaf79df5
+ 26.09@sha256:1f412e4e2b411a18d25538095629ef870185ea602f9840caab06088dec8231ae

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

AI Automated Review

Analysis engine: omniroute@http://litellm.ai.svc.cluster.local/v1 (openai)

Recommendation: Approve. Digest-only pin refresh of revenz/fileflows within the same 26.09 tag; no values, resources, routing, or persistence changes.

Change-by-change findings: The single hunk swaps the image digest (6d7ffdd1f412e4) on line 61. I read the full 112-line HelmRelease: security context (root entrypoint, PUID/PGID 568, supplemental groups for VAAPI), resource requests/limits (including the deliberate no-limit on ephemeral-storage documented in the comment), route, and persistence blocks are untouched. Git history shows this is a routine Renovate digest bump following the same pattern as the prior 26.09 digest updates.

Must-check items:

  • Validate manifest against target cluster version — no schema or apiVersion change; the HelmRelease structure is unchanged and matches the app-template v2 schema reference in the file header.
  • Resource quota / limit changes — none; requests and limits are byte-identical to the previous revision.
  • File path sanitization — not applicable; no paths, mounts, or commands changed in this diff.
  • Directory traversal vulnerabilities — not applicable; the change touches only the image tag line.

Unknowns or Needs Verification:

  • The Image Digest Provenance analysis could not resolve the upstream revision or creation date for either digest (missing OCI labels), and no upstream changelog is available for a digest-only rebuild within the same tag. What changed between 6d7ffdd and 1f412e4 is therefore not verified from the corpus; risk is limited to a same-tag image rebuild, and the reloader annotation will roll the pod on reconcile.

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Inline findings from the automated review (summary in the sticky comment).

image:
repository: revenz/fileflows
tag: 26.09@sha256:6d7ffdd05b67780ba8f9b5f3b96e41228634f3882448f937772973ffcaf79df5
tag: 26.09@sha256:1f412e4e2b411a18d25538095629ef870185ea602f9840caab06088dec8231ae

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Info: Digest-only bump within tag 26.09; upstream changelog for the rebuild could not be verified from the corpus.

Automated finding from AI PR review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants