Update molAOP Builder and Analyser catalog entries after their first releases - #300
Open
marvinm2 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Update molAOP Builder and Analyser catalog entries after their first releases#300marvinm2 wants to merge 1 commit into
marvinm2 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Both tools had their first tagged releases this week and the catalog entries were behind.
The Builder description is refreshed. It now mentions GO Molecular Function, Reactome and the Zenodo deposit, none of which the old text covered, and the version is 2.9.0.
For the Analyser I set the version to 5.0.0, filled in the licence and added a release-notes link. I also changed the display name from "MolAOP analyser" to "Molecular AOP Analyser", so it matches the Builder and what the tool calls itself.
Licences are written GPL-2.0-only rather than GPL-2.0, since that is the SPDX identifier both repos now declare.
One question. Both tools now have Zenodo software DOIs (Builder 10.5281/zenodo.21914244, Analyser 10.5281/zenodo.21914317). I have not put them in the doi field, because every populated doi in the catalog is a paper and the template describes that field as the DOI of the document related to the service. Is there somewhere else they belong, or should doi carry them?