Skip to content

Review: oja-landing is marketing-only (pages, pricing, CTAs, billing) - #1

Draft
Vanka07 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/oja-landing-review-e1e3
Draft

Vanka07 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/oja-landing-review-e1e3

Conversation

@Vanka07

@Vanka07 Vanka07 commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Review-doc only. No product rewrite, no copy fix, no deploy.

REVIEW.md maps every page, the pricing copy, every CTA, and the only payment-shaped file (payment-callback.html). Rechecked live ojapos.app / ojapos.ng on 2026-08-24 against the 2026-08-23 facts.

Headline: this repo is a static Vercel brochure. All “Try Free / Start Free Trial” buttons go to https://app.ojapos.app with no plan or checkout. There is no billing stack here.

Confirmed live:

  • Both hosts serve the same Vercel marketing page.
  • Starter Free / Growth ₦2,500 / Business ₦5,000.
  • FAQ + privacy put cloud backup on Business; pricing puts it on Growth.
  • /docs is a Vercel 404; no docs file exists.

Wired vs marketing: the Paystack callback is an optimistic UI stub (any reference/trxref → “Business plan activated”). catalog.html is a client-side hash renderer. Real signup/upgrade would be in the separate Expo app, which this review did not audit.

Did not change landing HTML. The FAQ/pricing conflict needs an entitlements source of truth before a copy patch.

Open in Web Open in Cursor 

Read-only findings from the static marketing repo and live
ojapos.app / ojapos.ng. No product rewrite and no deploy.

Co-authored-by: Jamiu Awoke <Vanka07@users.noreply.github.com>

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants