[WIP] kab-Latn: add missing

[athmanemokraoui]

bug fix :

• Added missing geminates: tt, qq, jj, cc, čč, ǧǧ, hh, ww, yy, ḥḥ, ṣṣ, ṭṭ, ḍḍ, ẓẓ, ṛṛ
• Mapped o to u since Kabyle has no native /o/ phoneme; words borrowed with /o/ are nativized as /u/
• Removed v and vv since /v/ is not a native Kabyle phoneme and only appears in recent loanwords only

Sources of information for the rules

I'm a native kabyle speaker working of projects related to kabyle language.

Once this done, I'll work to introduced a pre and post processing for kabyle and to handle complex forms.

[athmanemokraoui]

Hum, I think that the o should be removed too as it is not a standard in kabyle.

[dmort27]

I disagree with removing v and vv since the goal of Epitran is not to adjudicate what graphemes do and do not belong in a language, but to be maximally robust to what might actually occur in data (and having these in the mapping should not negatively impact the performance of the module on native Kabyle).

[athmanemokraoui]

Ah okay! Good to know :)

[dmort27]

Add back

[athmanemokraoui]

I added back v at the end on the file.

[juice500ml]

FYI, current test for Kabyle is failing:

FAIL: test_basic_words (test_kabyle.TestKabyle.test_basic_words)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/runner/work/epitran/epitran/epitran/test/test_kabyle.py", line 17, in test_basic_words
    self.assertEqual(tr, o)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^
AssertionError: 'θaqʃiʃt' != 'taqʃiʃt'
- θaqʃiʃt
? ^
+ taqʃiʃt
? ^

[athmanemokraoui]

FYI, current test for Kabyle is failing:

FAIL: test_basic_words (test_kabyle.TestKabyle.test_basic_words)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/runner/work/epitran/epitran/epitran/test/test_kabyle.py", line 17, in test_basic_words
    self.assertEqual(tr, o)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^
AssertionError: 'θaqʃiʃt' != 'taqʃiʃt'
- θaqʃiʃt
? ^
+ taqʃiʃt
? ^

Nice one ! t case.
In the case of taqcict we should get θaqʃiʃθ actually better θæqʃiʃθ :) I'm testing.

[athmanemokraoui]

May be I should close this as I'm working on it to correct some things?