Add per-pane new thread draft slots - #2404
Open
brsbl wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What was wrong
New-thread compose state was keyed as one browser-wide prompt draft. A second pane therefore reused the same draft identity, and the app could not preserve independent unsent composers or their creation destinations across navigation and layout restoration.
What changed
Before — Phase 1 parent (
c781d323e)The same modified New thread action remains a singleton composer.
After — this PR (
e503e4d35)Two panes retain independent composer text in separate persisted draft slots.
How you verified
pnpm exec turbo run typecheck: passed under Node 22.22.1.pnpm exec turbo run lint: passed under Node 22.22.1.@bb/apptest suite: 436 files; 3,370 passed and 3 skipped.bb-plugin-provider-claude-coderecorded-conformance replay harness, which reported different missing replay cells across retries. This branch has no diff in that package.BB-Thread-ID: thr_2e2gbjx943