Update test after frontend upgrade

[jketema]

Description

please enter the description of your change here

Change request type

• Release or process automation (GitHub workflows, internal scripts)
• Internal documentation
• External documentation
• Query files (.ql, .qll, .qls or unit tests)
• External scripts (analysis report or other code shipped as part of a release)

Rules with added or modified queries

• No rules added
• Queries have been added for the following rules:
  • rule number here
• Queries have been modified for the following rules:
  • rule number here

Release change checklist

A change note (development_handbook.md#change-notes) is required for any pull request which modifies:

• The structure or layout of the release artifacts.
• The evaluation performance (memory, execution time) of an existing query.
• The results of an existing query in any circumstance.

If you are only adding new rule queries, a change note is not required.

Author: Is a change note required?

• Yes
• No

🚨🚨🚨
Reviewer: Confirm that format of shared queries (not the .qll file, the
.ql file that imports it) is valid by running them within VS Code.

• Confirmed

Reviewer: Confirm that either a change note is not required or the change note is required and has been added.

• Confirmed

Query development review checklist

For PRs that add new queries or modify existing queries, the following checklist should be completed by both the author and reviewer:

Author

• Have all the relevant rule package description files been checked in?
• Have you verified that the metadata properties of each new query is set appropriately?
• Do all the unit tests contain both "COMPLIANT" and "NON_COMPLIANT" cases?
• Are the alert messages properly formatted and consistent with the style guide?
• Have you run the queries on OpenPilot and verified that the performance and results are acceptable?
  As a rule of thumb, predicates specific to the query should take no more than 1 minute, and for simple queries be under 10 seconds. If this is not the case, this should be highlighted and agreed in the code review process.
• Does the query have an appropriate level of in-query comments/documentation?
• Have you considered/identified possible edge cases?
• Does the query not reinvent features in the standard library?
• Can the query be simplified further (not golfed!)

Reviewer

• Have all the relevant rule package description files been checked in?
• Have you verified that the metadata properties of each new query is set appropriately?
• Do all the unit tests contain both "COMPLIANT" and "NON_COMPLIANT" cases?
• Are the alert messages properly formatted and consistent with the style guide?
• Have you run the queries on OpenPilot and verified that the performance and results are acceptable?
  As a rule of thumb, predicates specific to the query should take no more than 1 minute, and for simple queries be under 10 seconds. If this is not the case, this should be highlighted and agreed in the code review process.
• Does the query have an appropriate level of in-query comments/documentation?
• Have you considered/identified possible edge cases?
• Does the query not reinvent features in the standard library?
• Can the query be simplified further (not golfed!)

[Copilot]

Copilot review overview

🟡 Changes recommended

The test must use valid C++, and the query-result change requires a change note.

Once you've addressed the issues Copilot identified, you can request another Copilot review.

Review tier: Balanced
Findings: 1 · 1

New issues introduced by this change (2)

Severity	Finding
	cpp/​misra/​test/​rules/​RULE-0-2-3/​templates.cpp — This test case is ill-formed C++: A1 is a class, so a is private by default, and the…
	cpp/​misra/​test/​rules/​RULE-0-2-3/​UnusedTypeWithLimitedVisibility.expected — Removing this row changes the results of an existing query, so the repository policy in…

What changed in this PR

Updates RULE-0-2-3 tests after a frontend upgrade removes a reported false positive.

Changes:

• Marks the template-default-value case compliant.
• Removes its expected alert.
• Outstanding: test code is invalid C++, and a required change note is missing.

File	Description
UnusedTypeWithLimitedVisibility.expected	Removes the obsolete alert.
templates.cpp	Updates the test annotation.

---

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

[jketema]

Pre-existing problem.

[jketema]

Not needed, targets next branch.