Skip to content

deps: ops v0.7.2, so a scanned-era form says what it says - #7

Merged
tannevaled merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps-ops-v0.7.2
Aug 29, 2026
Merged

deps: ops v0.7.2, so a scanned-era form says what it says#7
tannevaled merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps-ops-v0.7.2

Conversation

@tannevaled

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Two releases behind on ops, and one of them matters to what a reader sees: a symbolic TrueType font is now read through its own character map rather than through a standard encoding.

A font marked symbolic does not promise its codes mean what Latin-1 says they mean. Read the wrong way it extracts as the wrong letters — the ordinary case in forms of the scanned era, where the tick boxes and the rules are glyphs. A document co-edited here was showing those letters to everybody in the session.

Nothing else changes: this module's own dependency on reader already pinned v0.6.0, so the denial-of-service fixes in the other release were already reaching it.

100% statement coverage, go vet and -race clean, nine cross-compile targets.

This was two releases behind on ops, and one of them matters to what a reader
sees: a symbolic TrueType font is now read through its own character map
rather than through a standard encoding.

A font marked symbolic does not promise its codes mean what Latin-1 says they
mean. Read the wrong way it extracts as the wrong letters, and that is the
ordinary case in forms of the scanned era, where the tick boxes and the rules
are glyphs. A document co-edited here was showing those letters to everybody in
the session.

Nothing else changes: this module's own dependency on reader already pinned
v0.6.0, so the denial-of-service fixes in the other release were already
reaching it.

100% statement coverage, go vet and -race clean, nine cross-compile targets.
@tannevaled
tannevaled merged commit 4ff3112 into main Aug 29, 2026
1 check passed
@tannevaled
tannevaled deleted the deps-ops-v0.7.2 branch August 29, 2026 18:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant