Skip to content

feat(ClassicalMechanics): add the Poisson bracket - #1698

Open
Sudo-RR wants to merge 2 commits into
leanprover-community:masterfrom
Sudo-RR:classical-poisson-bracket
Open

Sudo-RR wants to merge 2 commits into
leanprover-community:masterfrom
Sudo-RR:classical-poisson-bracket

Conversation

@Sudo-RR

@Sudo-RR Sudo-RR commented Sep 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • poissonBracket, antisymmetry, bilinearity in each argument, and deriv_comp_eq_poissonBracket connecting it to time evolution under Hamilton's equations.
  • gradient_add in Physlib.Mathematics.Calculus.Gradient, the missing additivity rule needed to prove bilinearity.

- `poissonBracket`, antisymmetry, bilinearity in each argument, and
  `deriv_comp_eq_poissonBracket` connecting it to time evolution under
  Hamilton's equations.
- `gradient_add` in `Physlib.Mathematics.Calculus.Gradient`, the missing
  additivity rule needed to prove bilinearity.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for this pull-request (PR). If this is your first PR, welcome to the community!

Below is what will happen next. Please read carefully if you are not familiar with the process. You may open other PRs while this one is being reviewed, and can stack PRs on top of each other, so don't let these steps slow you down.

  1. Some automated checks will be run on your PR. You can see the results of these checks at the buttom of your PR page. If any of these checks fail, you will need to fix the issues before your PR can be merged. You can learn more about these here, including how to run them locally, which is sometimes quicker than relying on the GitHub Actions. If you have never had a PR merged before, you may have to wait for a reviewer to manually start these checks (this is for security).

  2. A reviewer will look at your PR and may ask you to make changes. This may happen a couple of days after you submit your PR, so you may need to be patient. But it should not be longer than that - if it is please bring it to the attention of the community on the Zulip. The level of review will depend on where your PR is submitted. If it is submitted to ./Physlib or ./QuantumInfo, the review will be more thorough than if it is submitted to ./PhyslibAlpha. You can find out more about what the review process is looking for in our review guidelines. If a reviewer adds an awaiting-author label to your PR, address the review comments, then please remove that label by adding a comment with -awaiting-author. This helps us keep track of reviews.

  3. The reviewer will either approve your PR, or request more changes (in which case we return to step 2). Once your PR is approved, it will be merged by a maintainer, this should happen shortly after approval, though you may get more comments at this stage.

Tip: The easiest way to get have a fast review is to submit a PR that is small and self-contained, and has clear documentation explaining why things are the way they are in your chages.

If you have any problems or questions, please reach out to the community on the Zulip.

@Sudo-RR Sudo-RR changed the title feat(ClassicalMechanics): add the Poisson bracket feat(ClassicalMechanics): add the Poisson bracket -t classical mechanics Sep 29, 2026
@Sudo-RR Sudo-RR changed the title feat(ClassicalMechanics): add the Poisson bracket -t classical mechanics feat(ClassicalMechanics): add the Poisson bracket Sep 29, 2026
…acket_const_mul_right

- The key results of `PoissonBracket.lean` list the right-argument
  bilinearity lemmas `poissonBracket_add_right` and
  `poissonBracket_const_mul_right`, which the file states, instead of
  saying that they follow by antisymmetry.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

@jstoobysmith jstoobysmith left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A couple of small comments from me here.


/-- The time derivative of a phase-space function `f` composed with trajectories `p q : Time → X`
is the sum of the gradients of `f` paired with the velocities `∂ₜ p` and `∂ₜ q`. -/
theorem deriv_comp_eq_inner_gradient_add (f : X → X → ℝ) (p q : Time → X) (t : Time)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should likely be a lemma I think

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should put this and Physlib.ClassicalMechanics.HamiltonsEquations in a new subdirectory called ./HamiltonianMechanics

@jstoobysmith

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

awaiting-author

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes label Sep 30, 2026

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes medium

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants