Fix group-scoped conversation invite source storage - #1473
Merged
Paul Lizer (paullizer) merged 1 commit intoSep 8, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Fixes microsoft#1472 Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Paul Lizer (paullizer)
merged commit Sep 8, 2026
4112317
into
microsoft:Development
12 checks passed
24 tasks
Paul Lizer (paullizer)
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2026
Port source-aware group conversation conversion and resolve participant targets from primary group context. Preserve shared history, group-member restrictions, and repeat-invite routing. Refs #1472. Ports the backend fix from #1473. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
404 Conversation not foundwhen a group-scoped conversation is physically stored inconversations/messages.Linked issue
Fixes #1472
Release Notes & Latest Features
Is this visible to end users?
Is this admin-facing (Admin Settings, governance, deployment, config)?
Should this become a Latest Feature card?
Screenshot needed for the card?
Release notes are unchanged and are being handled separately through the existing user checkpoint.
Version bump
application/single_app/config.pyVERSIONthird segment bumped:0.261.023->0.261.024deployers/version.txtbump not needed becausedeployers/was not changedTesting / validation
python .\functional_tests\test_group_collaboration_source_storage_fix.py— 18 tests passed standalone, without application startup or Azure services. Under pytest, the new suite also exercises 106 passing subtests.git -c core.whitespace=blank-at-eol,blank-at-eof,space-before-tab,cr-at-eol diff --check— clean.Known baseline limitation:
test_collaboration_legacy_message_conversion.py::test_uploaded_image_conversion_preserves_user_senderalready fails on Development because it expects roleuser, while the existing model preserves roleimage. This was reproduced before the production edits. The model and that test are unchanged; the new regressions cover preservation of the current uploaded-image sender metadata, provenance, and associations. The combined run is not claimed to be fully passing.The new behavioral coverage uses actual production helpers and partition-aware in-memory stores for both layouts, all allowed group roles/statuses, history/citation preservation, no-mutation rejection paths, lookup precedence and service failures, API responses/events, repeated invites after source synchronization, AI backing-source reuse, masking, and manual/retention/archive cleanup with unrelated-record guards.
Documentation
docs/explanation/fixes/GROUP_COLLABORATION_SOURCE_STORAGE_FIX.mdSecurity checklist
@swagger_route(security=get_auth_security())— no routes added or changedsanitize_settings_for_user()— no settings/frontend changes