Skip to content

P4RT ACL and gRIBI interaction - #5987

Open
rohit-rp wants to merge 2 commits into
openconfig:mainfrom
rohit-rp:p4rt_acl_gribi_interaction
Open

P4RT ACL and gRIBI interaction#5987
rohit-rp wants to merge 2 commits into
openconfig:mainfrom
rohit-rp:p4rt_acl_gribi_interaction

Conversation

@rohit-rp

@rohit-rp rohit-rp commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

System Test Plan see for more info: b/540866108

  • Objective: Ensure predictable behavior when a packet might be matched by both a P4RT-programmed table entry (e.g., an ACL) and a gRIBI-programmed route.
    • Interfaces Used: P4RT, gRIBI, gNMI
    • Expected Outcome Summary:
      • The test verifies the actual packet treatment matches the expected vendor-documented pipeline order (e.g., ACLs before L3 lookup).
      • The interaction is consistent and does not cause instability.

@rohit-rp
rohit-rp requested a review from a team as a code owner September 4, 2026 17:42
@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request adds a new system test plan designed to validate the data plane behavior when packets are subject to both P4RT ACLs and gRIBI routes. The primary goal is to ensure that the packet treatment adheres to expected pipeline precedence and maintains system stability during concurrent programming of these two control plane protocols.

Highlights

  • New Test Case Added: Introduced a new system test (TE-1.3) to verify the interaction between P4RT-programmed ACLs and gRIBI-programmed routes.
  • Test Documentation: Added a comprehensive README detailing the test procedure, environment setup, and validation criteria for P4RT and gRIBI interaction.
  • Registry Update: Registered the new test case in the testregistry.textproto file to include it in the test suite.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize the Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counterproductive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new test plan, TE-1.3, to verify the interaction between P4RT ACLs and gRIBI forwarding. Feedback on the changes includes correcting style guide violations regarding the use of private IPv4 addresses (10.0.0.0/8) in the test documentation, replacing a placeholder for the required DUT platform, and reverting manual edits to the auto-generated testregistry.textproto file in favor of using the registry synchronization script.

Comment thread feature/p4rt/otg_tests/p4rt_acl_gribi_interaction_test/README.md
Comment thread feature/p4rt/otg_tests/p4rt_acl_gribi_interaction_test/README.md
Comment thread testregistry.textproto
@rohit-rp rohit-rp added the systemTest Systematic Iron gate test plan label Sep 7, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

systemTest Systematic Iron gate test plan

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants