bump deps for CI - #1868
Merged
petrelharp merged 1 commit intoSep 15, 2026
Merged
bump deps for CI#1868
Conversation
Contributor
|
Tick the box to add this pull request to the merge queue (same as
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1868 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.82% 99.82%
=======================================
Files 143 143
Lines 5039 5039
Branches 518 518
=======================================
Hits 5030 5030
Misses 6 6
Partials 3 3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
nspope
approved these changes
Sep 15, 2026
nspope
left a comment
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, lights are all green
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
trying to update the dependency chain here before moving over to a
uvworkflow as suggested in #1865