Conversation
`[All other integrations here](qonversion.io/integrations)` has no scheme, so GitHub renders it as a repository-relative path and it 404s where the README is actually read. `https://documentation.qonversion.io/discuss-new` is left over from readme.io and 404s too — it sits in "Have a question?", which is exactly where a reader goes when something did not work. It now points at the contact form on the site, next to the existing issues link. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The README states the SDK is available under the MIT license and carries an MIT badge, but the repository has no licence text in any form and the GitHub API reports `license: null`. The text is the one used in qonversion-ios-sdk, unchanged. The badge now links to the file instead of an anchor inside the README. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: qonversion/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🔗 Linked repositories identifiedCodeRabbit considers these linked repositories for cross-repo context during reviews:
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe PR adds an MIT ChangesLicense and README documentation
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Change: Other Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to The documentation and licensing updates are ready to merge with no identified production impact. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 7 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (7 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
Two broken links, both from the shared README template.
[All other integrations here](qonversion.io/integrations)has no scheme. GitHub renders it as a repository-relative path, so on the rendered README it resolves togithub.com/qonversion/unity-sdk/blob/main/qonversion.io/integrationsand 404s. Nowhttps://qonversion.io/integrations(200).https://documentation.qonversion.io/discuss-newin Have a question? is left over from readme.io and returns 404 — it is not among the redirects the docs site keeps. That is the link a reader follows when something did not work. It now points athttps://qonversion.io/contact-us(200), next to the existing GitHub issues link. The same target is used in the other SDK READMEs so the support channel is one and the same everywhere.Typo. «paywals» → «paywalls» in the A/B test bullet (it is copied across the READMEs).
No licence text in the repository. The README ends with «Qonversion SDK is available under the MIT license» and carries an MIT badge, but there is no
LICENSEfile and the GitHub API reportslicense: nullfor this repository — so formally the licence exists only as a claim. For a team running a legal review before adopting an SDK, that is a stopper.Added
LICENSEwith the MIT text copied fromqonversion-ios-sdk, copyright holder unchanged (Qonversion team <hi@qonversion.io>). The badge now links to that file instead of the#licenseanchor inside the README.Scope is deliberately narrow: links, licence, install, typo. Positioning, the opening paragraph, the bullets, the banner images and the version badge are untouched — those belong to the README template being rewritten separately.
Opened from a fork, so the review request could not be set from here — @SpertsyanKM, this one is for you.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code