Skip to content

Feat/stream lifecycle tests - #923

Open
ositaemmanuel653-netizen wants to merge 2 commits into
ritik4ever:mainfrom
ositaemmanuel653-netizen:feat/stream-lifecycle-tests
Open

Feat/stream lifecycle tests#923
ositaemmanuel653-netizen wants to merge 2 commits into
ritik4ever:mainfrom
ositaemmanuel653-netizen:feat/stream-lifecycle-tests

Conversation

@ositaemmanuel653-netizen

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Commit Type

  • feat: A new feature
  • fix: A bug fix
  • docs: Documentation only changes
  • style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (formatting, etc.)
  • refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
  • perf: A code change that improves performance
  • test: Adding missing or correcting existing tests
  • build: Changes affecting the build system or external dependencies
  • ci: Changes to CI/CD configuration files and scripts
  • chore: Other changes that don't modify src or test files
  • revert: Reverts a previous commit

Breaking change? (If yes, add BREAKING CHANGE in the commit footer)

  • Yes — this contains a breaking change
  • No

What changed

  • Added backend integration tests covering the complete stream lifecycle: create → pause → resume → claim → complete.
  • Configured tests to use an in-memory SQLite database to ensure isolation and avoid shared state between test runs.
  • Added assertions for indexer event recording throughout the stream lifecycle.
  • Added webhook delivery integration tests using a mock server to verify webhook notifications are sent correctly.
  • Covered the expected lifecycle states and associated side effects to provide end-to-end backend integration coverage.

Testing done

  • Ran the backend integration test suite.
  • Verified the stream lifecycle transitions from creation through completion.
  • Verified indexer events are recorded for the relevant lifecycle operations.
  • Verified webhook requests are delivered to the mock server.
  • Confirmed each test uses an isolated in-memory SQLite database with no shared state.

Related issues

Closes #769

Checklist

  • I used the correct commit type (see above) for the squashed commit message.
  • I kept the change focused on the related issue.
  • I added or updated tests where useful.
  • I updated documentation where behavior changed.
  • I verified the app still builds or explained why verification was skipped.
  • My commits follow [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/) (enforced by commitlint).

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Someone is attempting to deploy a commit to the ritik4ever's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@drips-wave

drips-wave Bot commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ositaemmanuel653-netizen Great news! 🎉 Based on an automated assessment of this PR, the linked Wave issue(s) no longer count against your application limits.

You can now already apply to more issues while waiting for a review of this PR. Keep up the great work! 🚀

Learn more about application limits

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: a3e59684-ae9f-4dd4-997c-61e03bdb3bf6


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@ositaemmanuel653-netizen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@ritik4ever

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[FEATURE] Add backend integration tests for stream lifecycle

1 participant