I evaluated the same image pair using both NVS.pth and geometry_pose.pth based on:
sh scripts/run_eval_nvs.sh
sh scripts/run_eval_geometry_pose.sh
However, the predicted pointmap from NVS.pth is significantly worse than that from geometry_pose.pth.
Below are the visual comparisons:
| NVS.pth (Top & Front View) |
geometry_pose.pth (Top & Front View) |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Let me know if I missed any required configuration when using NVS.pth, or if this behavior is expected.
I evaluated the same image pair using both
NVS.pthandgeometry_pose.pthbased on:However, the predicted pointmap from
NVS.pthis significantly worse than that fromgeometry_pose.pth.Below are the visual comparisons:
Left column: Top and front views from
NVS.pthRight column: Top and front views from
geometry_pose.pthLet me know if I missed any required configuration when using
NVS.pth, or if this behavior is expected.