docs: add Rstack CLI documentation skill - #72
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 129f0e70b2
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
|
||
| 1. Start with `node_modules/rstack/docs/llms.txt`, then read only the linked pages relevant to the task before proposing or making changes. | ||
|
|
||
| 2. For exact CLI flags and behavior, also run `rs -h` or `rs <command> -h` when supported. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In a normal project shell, rstack is only a devDependency (package.json:34-40), so its rs binary is added to PATH for package scripts but not for arbitrary commands; following this instruction therefore produces rs: command not found rather than the requested help. Invoke it through the repository's package manager, such as pnpm exec rs -h / pnpm exec rs <command> -h, so agents can actually inspect the installed CLI version.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
This repository is missing the Rstack CLI documentation skill. Add the same skill and lockfile metadata as rsbuild-plugin-template so coding agents can consult version-matched CLI documentation.