Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency js-yaml to v4.3.1 [security] - #42

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability
Open

chore(deps): update dependency js-yaml to v4.3.1 [security]#42
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
js-yaml 4.1.04.3.1 age confidence

js-yaml has prototype pollution in merge (<<)

CVE-2025-64718 / GHSA-mh29-5h37-fv8m

More information

Details

Impact

In js-yaml 4.1.0, 4.0.0, and 3.14.1 and below, it's possible for an attacker to modify the prototype of the result of a parsed yaml document via prototype pollution (__proto__). All users who parse untrusted yaml documents may be impacted.

Patches

Problem is patched in js-yaml 4.1.1 and 3.14.2.

Workarounds

You can protect against this kind of attack on the server by using node --disable-proto=delete or deno (in Deno, pollution protection is on by default).

References

https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Prototype_Pollution_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 5.3 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


JS-YAML: Quadratic-complexity DoS in merge key handling via repeated aliases

CVE-2026-53550 / GHSA-h67p-54hq-rp68

More information

Details

Summary

A crafted YAML document can trigger algorithmic CPU exhaustion in js-yaml merge-key processing (<<) by repeating the same alias many times in a merge sequence.
This causes quadratic parse-time behavior relative to input size and can block a Node.js worker/event loop for seconds with a relatively small payload (tens of KB), resulting in denial of service.

Details

The issue is in merge handling inside lib/loader.js:

  • storeMappingPair(...) iterates every element of a merge sequence when key tag is tag:yaml.org,2002:merge.
  • For each element, it calls mergeMappings(...).
  • mergeMappings(...) computes Object.keys(source) and performs _hasOwnProperty.call(destination, key) checks for each key.

When input is of the form:

a: &a {k0:0, k1:0, ..., kK:0}
b: {<<: [*a, *a, *a, ... repeated M times ...]}
all *a entries refer to the same anchored object. After the first merge, subsequent merges are semantically no-ops, but the parser still reprocesses all keys each time.
Resulting work is O(K * M), while input size is O(K + M), giving quadratic scaling as payload grows.
Relevant code path:
lib/loader.js in storeMappingPair(...) merge branch (keyTag === 'tag:yaml.org,2002:merge')
lib/loader.js mergeMappings(...)

Root cause

File: lib/loader.js
Function: storeMappingPair(state, _result, overridableKeys, keyTag, keyNode,
valueNode, startLine, startLineStart, startPos)
Lines: ~359-366

if (keyTag === 'tag:yaml.org,2002:merge') {
  if (Array.isArray(valueNode)) {
    for (index = 0, quantity = valueNode.length; index < quantity; index += 1) {
      mergeMappings(state, _result, valueNode[index], overridableKeys);
    }
  } else {
    mergeMappings(state, _result, valueNode, overridableKeys);
  }
}

When the merge value is a sequence (YAML 1.1 <<: [ *a, *a, ... ]), each element
is handed to mergeMappings() without deduplication. mergeMappings() then does

sourceKeys = Object.keys(source);
for (index = 0; index < sourceKeys.length; index += 1) {
  key = sourceKeys[index];
  if (!_hasOwnProperty.call(destination, key)) {
    setProperty(destination, key, source[key]);
    overridableKeys[key] = true;
  }
}

Every alias reference in the sequence resolves (by design) to the SAME object
via state.anchorMap. After the first merge, every subsequent merge of that same
reference is a pure no-op semantically, but still performs:

  • one Object.keys(source) call (O(K))
  • K _hasOwnProperty.call checks on the destination

Total: M * K hasOwnProperty checks + M Object.keys allocations, while the final
object and all observable side effects are identical to a single merge.

YAML semantics for <<: are idempotent and commutative over duplicate sources,
so collapsing duplicates preserves behavior exactly; this isn't a spec trade-off.

PoC

Environment:
js-yaml version: 4.1.1
Node.js: v24.5.0
Platform: arm64 macOS (reproduced consistently)
Reproduction script:
Create many keys in one anchored map (&a).
Merge that same alias repeatedly via <<: [*a, *a, ...].
Measure parse time and compare with control payload using single merge (<<: *a).
Observed repeated runs (same machine):
K=M=1000, input 9,909 bytes: ~33–36 ms
K=M=2000, input 20,909 bytes: ~121–123 ms
K=M=4000, input 42,909 bytes: ~524–537 ms
K=M=6000, input 64,909 bytes: ~1,608–1,829 ms
K=M=8000, input 86,909 bytes: ~3,395–3,565 ms
Control (single merge, similar key counts):
K=2000: ~1–2 ms
K=4000: ~3 ms
K=8000: ~5 ms
Also verified: repeated-merge output equals single-merge output (same key count and same JSON), confirming excess time is redundant computation.

Impact

This is a denial-of-service vulnerability (CPU exhaustion / algorithmic complexity).
Any service parsing untrusted YAML with js-yaml can be impacted, including API backends, CI tools, config processors, and automation services. An attacker can submit crafted YAML to significantly increase CPU time and reduce availability.

Suggested fix:

Dedupe the merge source list by reference before invoking mergeMappings. Any of
the following are minimal and preserve YAML 1.1 merge semantics:

dedupe in storeMappingPair:

if (keyTag === 'tag:yaml.org,2002:merge') {
  if (Array.isArray(valueNode)) {
    var seen = new Set();
    for (index = 0, quantity = valueNode.length; index < quantity; index += 1) {
      var src = valueNode[index];
      if (seen.has(src)) continue;   // idempotent; skip redundant alias
      seen.add(src);
      mergeMappings(state, _result, src, overridableKeys);
    }
  } else {
    mergeMappings(state, _result, valueNode, overridableKeys);
  }
}

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 5.3 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


js-yaml: YAML merge-key chains can force quadratic CPU consumption

CVE-2026-59869 / GHSA-52cp-r559-cp3m

More information

Details

Impact

js-yaml can spend quadratic CPU time parsing a document whose size grows only linearly. The issue is triggered by a chain of mappings where each mapping merges the previous one:

a0: &a0 { k0: 0 }
a1: &a1 { <<: *a0, k1: 1 }
a2: &a2 { <<: *a1, k2: 2 }
a3: &a3 { <<: *a2, k3: 3 }
...
b: *aN

For each new mapping, the loader has to enumerate the keys inherited from the previous mapping. With N chained mappings, this results in roughly 1 + 2 + ... + N merged-key visits, i.e., O(N^2) work for O(N) input size.

PoC

From N = 4000 delay become > 1s (doc size < 100K)

import { performance } from 'node:perf_hooks'
import { Buffer } from 'node:buffer'
import { load, YAML11_SCHEMA } from 'js-yaml'

const n = Number(process.argv[2] || 4000)

function makeMergeChain (count) {
  const lines = ['a0: &a0 { k0: 0 }']

  for (let i = 1; i < count; i++) {
    lines.push(`a${i}: &a${i} { <<: *a${i - 1}, k${i}: ${i} }`)
  }

  lines.push(`b: *a${count - 1}`)
  return `${lines.join('\n')}\n`
}

const source = makeMergeChain(n)

console.log(source.split('\n').slice(0, 8).join('\n'))
console.log('...')
console.log(source.split('\n').slice(-4).join('\n'))
console.log()
console.log(`N: ${n}`)
console.log(`YAML size: ${Buffer.byteLength(source)} bytes`)

const started = performance.now()
const result = load(source, { schema: YAML11_SCHEMA })
const elapsed = performance.now() - started

console.log(`parse time: ${elapsed.toFixed(1)} ms`)
console.log(`top-level keys: ${Object.keys(result).length}`)
console.log(`b keys: ${Object.keys(result.b).length}`)
Patches

Fix released. The most robust protection is to limit the total number of merged keys per parse call. This should close all past and future edge cases with merge. The default 10K-key limit should be okay in most cases.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 7.5 / 10 (High)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


JS-YAML: Quadratic CPU consumption in !!omap resolution (3.x and 4.x) — CVE-2026-59870 fix not backported

GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj

More information

Details

Quadratic CPU consumption in !!omap resolution (js-yaml 3.x and 4.x)
Summary

resolveYamlOmap() enforces key uniqueness for !!omap sequences with a linear
scan (objectKeys.indexOf(...)) inside the per-element loop, making resolution
O(n²) in the number of entries. A modestly sized YAML document therefore
consumes disproportionate CPU inside yaml.load(), giving a denial of service
against any consumer that parses untrusted YAML.

!!omap is registered in the default schema
(lib/schema/default.jsrequire('../type/omap')), so a plain
yaml.load(untrustedInput) with no options is affected — no custom schema or
non-default configuration is required.

This is the same weakness as CVE-2026-59870 / GHSA-724g-mxrg-4qvm, which was
fixed in the 5.x line in 5.2.1. That fix was never backported: both currently
maintained legacy lines still carry the original implementation.

Affected versions
Line Latest tested Status
3.x 3.15.0 Affected — objectKeys.indexOf(pairKey) at lib/type/omap.js:29
4.x 4.3.0 Affected — objectKeys.indexOf(pairKey) at lib/type/omap.js:30
5.x 5.2.2 Not affected — fixed in 5.2.1 (uses a Set)

Both figures are the newest release of each line at the time of writing, so
this is not a "you are on an old version" issue.

Details

lib/type/omap.js (js-yaml 4.3.0):

if (objectKeys.indexOf(pairKey) === -1) objectKeys.push(pairKey)
else return false

objectKeys grows by one element per entry, and Array.prototype.indexOf is a
linear scan, so resolving an n-entry !!omap performs roughly
1 + 2 + … + n comparisons — quadratic in n. The work happens synchronously
inside yaml.load(), blocking the event loop for its whole duration.

The 5.x line already solves exactly this by tracking seen keys in a Set
(src/tag/sequence/omap.ts):

if (carrier.seen.has(key)) return 'duplicate key in ordered map'
carrier.seen.add(key)
Proof of concept
// poc.js  —  node poc.js
const yaml = require('js-yaml');
const doc = n => '!!omap\n' + Array.from({length: n}, (_, i) => `- k${i}: ${i}`).join('\n') + '\n';

for (const n of [10000, 20000, 40000, 80000]) {
  const d = doc(n), t = Date.now();
  yaml.load(d);                      // default schema, no options
  console.log(`n=${n} bytes=${d.length} load=${Date.now() - t}ms`);
}
Measured (node v20.20.2, default heap, no flags)

js-yaml 4.3.0

n=10000  bytes=137787   load=54ms
n=20000  bytes=297787   load=169ms
n=40000  bytes=617787   load=646ms
n=80000  bytes=1257787  load=2607ms

js-yaml 3.15.0

n=10000  bytes=137787   load=53ms
n=20000  bytes=297787   load=166ms
n=40000  bytes=617787   load=641ms
n=80000  bytes=1257787  load=2567ms

Runtime grows by a factor of ~4 for each doubling of n, which is the
signature of O(n²) (linear growth would be ~2×).

Scaling further: a 2.48 MB document with 150,000 entries blocked
yaml.load() for 10.8 seconds.

Impact

Any service that parses attacker-influenced YAML with js-yaml 3.x or 4.x can be
stalled with a small input. Because the loop is synchronous, a single request
blocks the Node.js event loop and stalls every other request in the process —
so the amplification is per-process, not just per-request.

Suggested severity: consistent with CVE-2026-59870 (the same weakness in
5.x), i.e. Availability-only impact, network attack vector, no privileges or
user interaction required.

Suggested fix

Mirror the 5.x fix — replace the linear scan with a Set:

// lib/type/omap.js
const seen = new Set()
// ...
if (seen.has(pairKey)) return false
seen.add(pairKey)

This preserves the existing duplicate-key rejection semantics exactly while
making resolution O(n). A maxOmapLength-style cap would also work, but the
Set matches what 5.x already ships and requires no new option.

References
  • CVE-2026-59870 / GHSA-724g-mxrg-4qvm — same weakness in 5.0.0–5.2.0, fixed in 5.2.1
  • lib/type/omap.js (3.x, 4.x) — the affected resolver
  • lib/schema/default.js — registers !!omap in the default schema
Discovery

Found by an automated static-analysis and executed-proof-of-concept scanner run
against js-yaml 4.2.0, then manually verified against 3.15.0 and 4.3.0 by
executing the proof of concept above. All timings in this report were measured
on the current releases of each line, not on the version originally scanned.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 7.5 / 10 (High)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


Release Notes

nodeca/js-yaml (js-yaml)

v4.3.1

Compare Source

v4.3.0

Compare Source

v4.2.0

Compare Source

Added
  • Added docs/safety.md with notes about processing untrusted YAML.
  • Added maxDepth (100) loader option. Not a problem, but gives a better
    exception instead of RangeError on stack overflow.
  • Added maxMergeSeqLength (20) loader option. Not a problem after merge fix,
    but an additional restriction for safety.
  • Added sourcemaps to dist/ builds.
Changed
  • Stop resolving numbers with underscores as numeric scalars, #​627.
  • Switched dev toolchains to Vite / neostandard.
  • Updated demo.
  • Reorganized tests.
  • dist/ files are no longer kept in the repository.
Fixed
  • Fix parsing of properties on the first implicit block mapping key, #​62.
  • Fix trailing whitespace handling when folding flow scalar lines, #​307.
  • Reject top-level block scalars without content indentation, #​280.
  • Ensure numbers survive round-trip, #​737.
  • Fix test coverage for issue #​221.
  • Fix flow scalar trailing whitespace folding, #​307.
  • Fix digits in YAML named tag handles.
Security
  • Fix potential DoS via quadratic complexity in merge - deduplicate repeated
    elements (makes sense for malformed files > 10K).

v4.1.1

Compare Source

Security
  • Fix prototype pollution issue in yaml merge (<<) operator.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: fad7a74

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

  • 🔍 Trigger a full review

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch from 7756991 to ce6774b Compare November 18, 2025 12:05
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch from ce6774b to 3b87187 Compare December 3, 2025 19:29
@socket-security

socket-security Bot commented Dec 3, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review the following alerts detected in dependencies.

According to your organization's Security Policy, it is recommended to resolve "Warn" alerts. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Action Severity Alert  (click "▶" to expand/collapse)
Warn High
Protestware or unwanted behavior: npm es5-ext

Note: The script attempts to run a local post-install script, which could potentially contain malicious code. The error handling suggests that it is designed to fail silently, which is a common tactic in malicious scripts.

From: pnpm-lock.yamlnpm/@1stg/app-config@4.1.3npm/es5-ext@0.10.64

ℹ Read more on: This package | This alert | What is protestware?

Next steps: Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support@socket.dev.

Suggestion: Consider that consuming this package may come along with functionality unrelated to its primary purpose.

Mark the package as acceptable risk. To ignore this alert only in this pull request, reply with the comment @SocketSecurity ignore npm/es5-ext@0.10.64. You can also ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all. To ignore an alert for all future pull requests, use Socket's Dashboard to change the triage state of this alert.

View full report

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from 7b2728d to 23c963f Compare December 31, 2025 19:09
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch from 23c963f to 6dd28ea Compare January 8, 2026 17:36
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from c4b5c72 to 7dcfc5a Compare January 23, 2026 19:50
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch from 7dcfc5a to d81c3a8 Compare February 2, 2026 17:41
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from e87d062 to da84d19 Compare February 17, 2026 16:10
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch from da84d19 to bf78331 Compare March 5, 2026 15:46
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch from bf78331 to 34c38a2 Compare March 13, 2026 11:13
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency js-yaml to v4.1.1 [security] chore(deps): update dependency js-yaml to v4.1.1 [security] - autoclosed Mar 27, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot closed this Mar 27, 2026
@renovate
renovate Bot deleted the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch March 27, 2026 00:47
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency js-yaml to v4.1.1 [security] - autoclosed chore(deps): update dependency js-yaml to v4.1.1 [security] Mar 30, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot reopened this Mar 30, 2026
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch 3 times, most recently from 68cd39f to 65cfb02 Compare April 1, 2026 20:06
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch from 65cfb02 to 57753bc Compare April 8, 2026 20:59
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency js-yaml to v4.1.1 [security] chore(deps): update dependency js-yaml to v4.1.1 [security] - autoclosed Apr 27, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot closed this Apr 27, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency js-yaml to v4.1.1 [security] - autoclosed chore(deps): update dependency js-yaml to v4.1.1 [security] Apr 27, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot reopened this Apr 27, 2026
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from 57753bc to a1e1905 Compare April 27, 2026 23:06
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch from a1e1905 to a474ad4 Compare April 29, 2026 12:56
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from 7960d95 to 75fbaff Compare May 18, 2026 09:39
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from c09e033 to 46e1b84 Compare June 1, 2026 19:06
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch from 46e1b84 to 2bce3ba Compare June 13, 2026 15:49
@socket-security

socket-security Bot commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Diff Package Supply Chain
Security
Vulnerability Quality Maintenance License
Updatedjs-yaml@​4.1.0 ⏵ 4.3.1100 +1100 +24100 +194 +1100

View full report

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch from 2bce3ba to 5c69572 Compare June 16, 2026 23:04
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency js-yaml to v4.1.1 [security] chore(deps): update dependency js-yaml to v4.2.0 [security] Jun 16, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency js-yaml to v4.2.0 [security] chore(deps): update dependency js-yaml to v4.1.1 [security] Jun 29, 2026
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch from 5c69572 to fa930c0 Compare June 29, 2026 19:44
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from 8656eda to a5df0a1 Compare July 16, 2026 16:15
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from c4c4e21 to f749904 Compare July 24, 2026 19:37
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch from f749904 to c3e9a91 Compare July 30, 2026 18:44
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from 56d85c3 to 8346387 Compare August 14, 2026 18:55
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch from 8346387 to fad7a74 Compare August 26, 2026 16:06
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency js-yaml to v4.1.1 [security] chore(deps): update dependency js-yaml to v4.3.1 [security] Aug 26, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants