Skip to content

Retire the self-scored benchmark comparison from living surfaces - #89

Merged
smaramwbc merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/retire-self-scored-benchmark
Sep 8, 2026
Merged

Retire the self-scored benchmark comparison from living surfaces#89
smaramwbc merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/retire-self-scored-benchmark

Conversation

@smaramwbc

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Companion to statewave-web #271/#293: the docs' living pages (overview, roadmap, why-statewave) now cite the support-workflow benchmark as '8 criteria, open harness' instead of the self-scored 8/8-vs-2/8 comparison, and the proof-figure SSoT + mirrors are reworked to match the site's new PROOF_FIGURES constants. History (CHANGELOG, release notes) intentionally untouched per the checker's own policy. check-proof-figures.py verified green against merged statewave-web main.

statewave-web #271/#293 retired the 8/8-vs-2/8 support-workflow claim
from the marketing site: scoring our own harness against a strawman
baseline is not a trustworthy proof figure. This carries the same
retirement through the docs' living pages — overview, roadmap, and
why-statewave now cite the benchmark as "8 criteria, open harness" and
invite readers to run it themselves — and reworks the proof-figure SSoT
to match: benchmark_statewave/benchmark_naive become support_criteria,
docs mirrors follow the new wording, the web mirrors grep the
PROOF_FIGURES constants the site centralized on, and the removed
HomePage/blog score surfaces drop their mirror entries.

CHANGELOG and release notes keep the historical figure on purpose —
they are point-in-time snapshots, per the checker's own policy.

check-proof-figures.py verified green against merged statewave-web main.
@smaramwbc
smaramwbc merged commit 12cd652 into main Sep 8, 2026
2 checks passed
@smaramwbc
smaramwbc deleted the docs/retire-self-scored-benchmark branch September 8, 2026 18:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant