Skip to content

implement problems in Binary search 1 problem set in python - #2524

Open
PavanKaushikAduri wants to merge 4 commits into
super30admin:masterfrom
PavanKaushikAduri:master
Open

implement problems in Binary search 1 problem set in python#2524
PavanKaushikAduri wants to merge 4 commits into
super30admin:masterfrom
PavanKaushikAduri:master

Conversation

@PavanKaushikAduri

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Search in Rotated Sorted Array (search_in_rotated_sorted_array.py)

Your solution is excellent and matches the reference solution in both approach and efficiency. The binary search logic is correctly implemented, and you've properly handled the rotated sorted array case by identifying which half is sorted and narrowing the search accordingly. Your comments clearly explain the approach.

A few minor suggestions:

  1. Consider adding a brief docstring or more concise comments at the top of the function
  2. The condition nums[mid] >= target could be simplified to nums[mid] > target since you've already checked nums[mid] == target above, but this is a very minor stylistic point
  3. Make sure to import List from typing if you're using type hints (though this is typically handled by LeetCode's environment)

Overall, this is a clean, correct, and efficient solution.

VERDICT: PASS


Search in a Sorted Array of Unknown Size (search_sorted_array_of_unknown_size.py)

Strengths:

  • Your solution correctly implements the exponential search followed by binary search pattern
  • Good documentation with time/space complexity analysis
  • The three-sentence explanation of the approach is clear and accurate
  • Proper handling of the unknown array size via exponential expansion of high

Areas for Improvement:

  • The comments could be slightly more concise. The current explanation is a bit verbose for a "three sentences only" requirement
  • Consider adding a brief comment about why reader.get(high) < target is the correct termination condition (since out-of-bounds returns 2^31 - 1, which is always > any valid target)
  • The variable naming is good, but you could add a brief inline comment for the exponential search loop to make the intent clearer

Overall:
Your solution is functionally identical to the reference solution and handles all edge cases correctly. The implementation is clean and follows good practices. Well done!

VERDICT: PASS


Search a 2D Matrix (search_in_2d_matrix.py)

Excellent work! Your solution is correct, efficient, and well-implemented. Here are some observations:

Strengths:

  • Your approach of treating the 2D matrix as a virtual 1D array is the optimal solution for this problem
  • The mapping using row = mid // n and col = mid % n is correctly implemented
  • The code is clean, readable, and follows Python conventions
  • Time and space complexity are both optimal (O(log(m*n)) and O(1))
  • Your comments clearly explain the approach

Minor suggestions for improvement:

  • Consider adding a brief comment about why mid // n gives the row and mid % n gives the column (e.g., "because each row has n elements, so dividing by n gives the row index, and the remainder gives the column index")
  • The return True statement on the same line as the if is acceptable but some style guides prefer it on a new line for readability
  • You could add edge case handling comments (though the current implementation handles them correctly)

Overall, this is a high-quality solution that demonstrates a clear understanding of the problem and the optimal approach.

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants