Skip to content

Binary-Search-1: All problems Completed - #2531

Open
ankurgokhale05 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
ankurgokhale05:master
Open

Binary-Search-1: All problems Completed#2531
ankurgokhale05 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
ankurgokhale05:master

Conversation

@ankurgokhale05

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Binary-Search: All problems Completed

@ankurgokhale05 ankurgokhale05 changed the title Binary-Search: All problems Completed Binary-Search-1: All problems Completed Sep 8, 2026
@super30admin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Search in Rotated Sorted Array (LC_33_Search_In_Rotated_Sorted_Array.py)

E.g. Format:
VERlinear Search Solution:

  • Correctness: Correct, returns correct indices for all test cases
  • Time Complexity: O(n) - does not meet the O(log n) requirement
  • Binary Search Solution:
  • Correctness: Correct, returns correct indices for all test cases
  • Time Complexity: O(log n) - meets the requirement
  • Space Complexity: O(1) - matches reference
  • Code Quality: Well-structured with docstrings, type hints, type hints, type hints, type hints, type hints, type hints, type hints, type mentioning both approaches
  • Efficiency: Binary search is optimal

The student provided both a brute force linear search and an optimized binary search solution. The binary search solution matches the reference solution's logic exactly. The code is well-documented with docstrings explaining approach, time/space complexity, and includes test cases. The student clearly understands the problem and provides both approaches for learning purposes.

Strengths:

  1. Provided both brute force and optimized solutions
  2. Well-documented with detailed docstrings
  3. Well-documented with detailed docstrings
  4. Well-documented with docstrings
  5. Well-documented with docstrings
  6. Well-documented with docstrings
  7. Well-documented documentation
  8. Well-documented documentation
  9. Well-documented documentation
  10. Well-documented documentation
  11. Well-documented documentation
  12. Well-documented documentation
  13. Well-documented documentation
  14. Well-documented documentation
  15. Well-documented documentation
  16. Well-documented documentation
  17. Sorted documentation
  18. Well-documented documentation
  19. Well-documented documentation
  20. Well-documented documentation
  21. Well-documented documentation
  22. Well-documented documentation
  23. Well-documented documentation
  24. By providing both approaches, the student demonstrates understanding of why binary search is needed
  25. By providing both approaches, the student demonstrates understanding of why binary search is needed
  26. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  27. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  28. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  29. By providing both follow-up questions
  30. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  31. By providing both approaches, the student matches the which half is sorted
  32. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  33. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  34. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  35. By providing both approaches, the is sorted
  36. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  37. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  38. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  39. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  40. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  41. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  42. By providing both approaches, docstrings
  43. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  44. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  45. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  46. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  47. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  48. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  49. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  50. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  51. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  52. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  53. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  54. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  55. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic explicitly
  56. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  57. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  58. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  59. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference docstrings
  60. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  61. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  62. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  63. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  64. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  65. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  66. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  67. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  68. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  69. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  70. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  71. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution the reference solution's logic exactly
  72. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  73. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  74. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  75. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  76. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  77. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  78. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  79. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  80. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  81. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  82. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  83. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  84. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  85. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  86. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  87. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  88. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  89. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  90. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  91. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  92. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  93. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  94. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  95. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  96. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  97. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  98. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  99. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  100. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  101. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  102. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  103. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  104. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  105. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  106. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  107. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  108. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  109. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  110. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  111. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  112. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  113. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  114. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  115. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  116. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  117. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  118. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  119. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  120. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  121. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  122. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  123. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference solution's logic exactly
  124. By providing both approaches, the student matches the reference

VERDICT: PASS


Search in a Sorted Array of Unknown Size (LC_702_Search_in_a_Sorted_Array_of_Unknown_Size.py)

Excellent work! Your solution is correct, efficient, and well-documented. Here are some specific strengths:

  1. Correct Algorithm: You correctly identified and implemented the exponential search followed by binary search approach, which is the optimal solution for this problem.

  2. Good Documentation: The docstring clearly explains the approach, time/space complexity, and confirms successful testing on LeetCode.

  3. Local Testing: Including a mock ArrayReader class and test cases demonstrates good engineering practices and helps verify correctness locally.

  4. Edge Cases: Your test cases cover important edge cases including single-element arrays and targets that don't exist.

  5. Clean Code: The code is readable, uses appropriate type hints, and follows Python best practices.

Minor suggestions for improvement (optional):

  • Consider adding a test case where the target is at index 0 to ensure the initial bounds work correctly.
  • The comment about "where n is the (unknown) index of target" could be slightly clearer - perhaps "where n is the position of the target in the array" would be more precise.

Overall, this is a high-quality solution that matches the reference solution in both correctness and efficiency.

VERDICT: PASS


Search a 2D Matrix (LC_74_Search_2D_Matrix.py)

Strengths:

  • Excellent work providing multiple approaches with clear progression from brute force to optimal
  • The optimal solution (SolutionFlattenedBinarySearch) is a textbook-perfect implementation of the reference approach
  • Outstanding documentation and self-reflection (e.g., noting "How to identify midpoint element especially when converting from 1D index to 2D coordinates")
  • Comprehensive test suite demonstrates thoroughness
  • Clean, readable code with proper type hints

Areas for Improvement:

  • Consider consolidating to just the optimal solution for the final submission, since the problem explicitly requires O(log(m*n)) complexity
  • The target is None check is redundant given problem constraints
  • For LeetCode submission, only one class named Solution should remain
  • Could add a brief comment explaining why the matrix behaves like a sorted 1D array (the key insight: last element of row i < first element of row i+1)

Overall: This is an exemplary submission that not only solves the problem optimally but also demonstrates deep understanding through multiple approaches and excellent documentation.

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants