Skip to content

Design-1: Design Hashset & Min Stack Complete - #2699

Open
ankurgokhale05 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
ankurgokhale05:master
Open

Design-1: Design Hashset & Min Stack Complete#2699
ankurgokhale05 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
ankurgokhale05:master

Conversation

@ankurgokhale05

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Design-1: Design Hashset & Min Stack Complete

@super30admin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Design HashSet (Design_Hashset.py)

FEEDBACK must contain at minor 4 bullet points. Feedback must be bullet points (start with "-"). Each bullet must be doc

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT


Min Stack (Min_Stack.py)

This is an outstanding solution that demonstrates strong understanding of the problem and excellent software engineering practices. Specific strengths:

  1. Multiple approaches: Providing both two-stack and one-stack solutions shows depth of understanding and gives the reader options to choose from.

  2. Thorough documentation: The docstrings clearly explain the algorithm, complexity analysis, and trade-offs.

  3. Comprehensive testing: The test suite covers edge cases that many solutions miss, including duplicate minimums, strictly increasing/decreasing sequences, and empty stack handling.

  4. Defensive programming: Raising IndexError on empty stack operations is good practice, even though the problem guarantees non-empty operations.

  5. Clean implementation: The code is readable, well-organized, and follows Python conventions.

Minor suggestions for future improvement:

  • Consider adding a brief comparison of when to prefer each approach (e.g., two-stack is more intuitive, one-stack uses less code)
  • The float('inf') initialization in the one-stack approach could be replaced with None and a check, but float('inf') works fine here

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants