Skip to content

Hashing-1 - #2302

Open
mananrg wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
mananrg:master
Open

Hashing-1#2302
mananrg wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
mananrg:master

Conversation

@mananrg

@mananrg mananrg commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Grouping Anagrams Together (Problem1.py)

Strengths:

  • Clean, readable implementation that clearly expresses the algorithm
  • Correctly handles all edge cases (empty strings, single characters)
  • Good use of dictionary to naturally group anagrams
  • Simple and maintainable code logic

Areas for Improvement:

  • Avoid using map and str as variable names as they shadow built-in types; consider anagram_map and s instead
  • Consider using defaultdict from collections to simplify the code:
    from collections import defaultdict
    anagram_map = defaultdict(list)
  • The sorting approach is O(K log K) per string; for very long strings, consider alternative approaches like character counting (O(K))

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT


Isomorphic Strings (Problem2.py)

Strengths:

  • Correct algorithmic approach using bidirectional mapping
  • Good variable naming (sChar, tChar, sMap, tMap)
  • Proper early return on mismatch detection
  • Clean loop structure

Areas for Improvement:

  1. Fix the syntax error - the function definition is incomplete without a class wrapper
  2. Correct the space complexity claim to O(n) since dictionaries can grow to n entries
  3. Add proper test cases with function calls to demonstrate the solution works
  4. Consider adding type hints for better code documentation
  5. The test case line s = "egg", t = "add" creates a tuple, not two variables - this won't work as intended

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT


Word Pattern (Problem3.py)

Strengths:

  • Clean and readable implementation that follows the problem requirements
  • Proper handling of edge cases (length mismatch)
  • Good use of two hash maps to maintain the bijection property
  • Idiomatic Python code with clear variable naming

Areas for Improvement:

  • The variable names sMap and tMap could be more descriptive (e.g., patternToWord and wordToPattern) to improve readability
  • Consider combining the two conditional checks into a single expression using continue or early return logic for slightly cleaner code
  • The range(0, n) can be simplified to range(n) (removing the redundant 0)

Overall, this is a solid solution that correctly solves the problem with optimal time and space complexity.

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants