Update and create Taamera Libanos records - #2082
Conversation
I updated the miracles of Libānos and created new records according to our discussion in BetaMasaheft/Documentation#3387.
I updated the miracles of Libānos and created new records according to our discussion in BetaMasaheft/Documentation#3387.
I updated the Taammera Libanos records in BetaMasaheft/Works#2082 and LIT1494Gadlas in BetaMasaheft/Works#2081. I created new PRS records in BetaMasaheft/Persons#1448.
| <revisionDesc> | ||
| <change who="MV" when="2017-09-08">Created entity</change> | ||
| <change when="2020-02-01" who="ES">updated after MGM-012</change> | ||
| <change when="2026-09-03" who="CH">Upated labels and added corresp CAe to edition</change> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All div together with labels must be deleted as per issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have already restored this relation.
| </listBibl> | ||
| <listRelation> | ||
| <relation name="ecrm:P129_is_about" active="LIT4717TaammerLi" passive="PRS6298Libanos"/> | ||
| <relation name="saws:contains" active="LIT4717TaammerLi" passive="LIT7618MirLib1"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
no, the individual miracles should have a "may form part of" relation, this is not needed, as the TM collection in any manuscript may have any of the miracles, not all of them saws:contains means it always includes all parts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I did not find a relation of that kind in the list. The relations, which I found are saws:contains, which is for a fix sequence and ecrm:CLP46i_may_form_part_of, which is for the individual record referring to the collection.
So far all miracles have a ecrm:CLP46i_may_form_part_of referring to LIT4717TaammerLi. Therefore it is redundant to have the opposite relation here. We have double notification of each miracle in the list, if we include each miracle here and in the miracle records.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is exactly what I meant. individual miracles have may form part of relation. There should be no reduntant and misleading saws:contains relations
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My initial comment implied DELETE ALL WRONG saws:contains RELATIONS
| <label>Miracles</label> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <listRelation><relation name="ecrm:P129_is_about" active="LIT4717TaammerLi" passive="PRS6298Libanos"></relation></listRelation> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this relation
<relation name="ecrm:P129_is_about" active="LIT4717TaammerLi" passive="PRS6298Libanos"></relation> should not have been deleted
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have already restored it.
eu-genia
left a comment
eu-genia
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you, wonderful work!
2 participants
I updated the miracles of Libānos and created new records according to our discussion in BetaMasaheft/Documentation#3387.