⚡ Optimize subscriber iteration in notifySubscribers#33
Conversation
Co-authored-by: johnstrand <11484777+johnstrand@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Co-authored-by: johnstrand <11484777+johnstrand@users.noreply.github.com>
💡 What: Replaced the
Array.forEachcall on the list of subscribers with a nativefor...ofloop insrc/Squawk.ts.🎯 Why: The
Array.forEachloop incurs a function call overhead for every execution of the loop body. Given thatnotifySubscriberscan be called very frequently and process many subscribers, replacingforEachwith a nativefor...ofloop removes this unnecessary overhead and improves CPU execution time and memory efficiency.📊 Measured Improvement:
A benchmark was run to test the time required to dispatch 1000 updates to 10000 subscribers.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 7691523417830553353 started by @johnstrand